Attitudes and Social Cognition

Unbelieving the Unbelievable: Some Problems in the Rejection of False Information

Daniel T. Gilbert
University of Texas at Austin
Douglas S. Krull
University of Missouri at Columbia
Patrick S. Malone
University of Texas at Austin

Spinoza claimed that to understand a proposition is already to accept it as true; rejecting a falsehood requires a second, separate effort that can be disrupted. Descartes denied this: for him, comprehension and assent are independent. Study 1 set out to decide between them.

In this classroom replication you play the role of the subject. You will learn a small fragment of an invented “Hopi” vocabulary, occasionally have your processing interrupted by a tone, and then sit an identification test. Your anonymous responses are added to the class aggregate for discussion.

Method

Part I: Vocabulary. Twenty trials. Each pairs an invented word with an English noun and labels the pairing TRUE or FALSE. On some trials a tone will sound and you must respond to it at once.

Part II: Identification. For each pairing, was it true, false, never seen, or seen but with no signal?

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1990, Vol. 59, No. 4, 601–613
601